Rubrics and items
Every item is judged one of three ways:- Automatic — computed directly from the course: outcomes are present, every module states an objective, every check, scenario, and assignment is tagged with the outcomes it assesses, the accessibility score meets the policy, reading level, navigation instructions, required template structure, time estimates, and more.
- AI-assisted — Tessera judges the item against its written criteria and returns a finding with evidence and a suggested fix. Like every other AI output in Tessera, a finding is a draft: it needs review before it counts. An accepted “likely met” finding counts as met, an accepted “likely not met” finding counts as not met, and anything dismissed or unclear stays “needs review.”
- Attestation — a named reviewer confirms the item directly, with a note and a date. A reviewer can also mark an automatic item “not applicable” with a note, but can’t attest past an automatic result any other way — that one is fixed by fixing the course.
Built-in rubrics
Tessera ships two rubrics:- The Tessera course standard — written in plain language, in eight areas: overview and navigation, outcomes and objectives, assessment and feedback, materials, engagement and interaction, technology and AI, learner support, and accessibility.
-
OSCQR 4.0 — SUNY’s open course-quality rubric, reproduced under its license with the required attribution:
The OSCQR Rubric, Dashboard & Process are made available by Online Learning Consortium, Inc. (OLC - https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC By 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The OSCQR Rubric, Dashboard & Process were originally developed by the State University of New York (SUNY) through the Open SUNY® COTE, now SUNY Online Teaching (https://online.suny.edu/onlineteaching/). Open SUNY, SUNY Online, and its logos are registered trademarks of the State University of New York.